This image was taken as a test of the smart phone at the "night" preset, rather than for being a great composition. The only lighting was from the streetlights and, apart from resizing, a watermark and cropping it's SOOC. Yes, it's noisy and soft - but in view of the EXIF info (shown to the right) I'd say it's a surprising result for a tiny sensor. You may be interested in my new article
'Smartphones and cameras'.
18 comments
William Sutherland said:
Admired in:
www.ipernity.com/group/tolerance
ColRam said:
Jaap van 't Veen said:
Gudrun said:
Amelia said:
tiabunna replied to Amelia:
tiabunna said:
ADDENDUM: I've just taken this (also in PiP) with the full frame camera (Pentax K1) fitted with a manual f2.8 28mm lens. The interesting thing is that the ISO is 12800, as with the phone image, but the aperture of f2.8 is much slower than the phone's f1.7 - yet the shutter speed here was FASTER than the phone (0.25 sec, rather than 0.5 sec) and the image exposure looks much the same. Something doesn't match I suspect!
Gudrun replied to tiabunna:
What amazes me is the starburst at f/1,7, I have no idea how a phone camera manages this when a "normal" lens will only do it stopped down.
Amelia said:
RHH said:
Janet Brien said:
Ulrich John said:
Lian said:
Erhard Bernstein said:
No, great experiments and a good article, too!
Gudrun replied to Erhard Bernstein: