Dear members and friends of ipernity,
1) Notes for new members.
It was a task for the Moderator to send an ipermail to new members with useful information. This would inevitably not be at the instant of registration. It also required a decision on who to exclude as likely spammers. The text is now available in our 7 supported languages, as item 1.6 in the FAQ section. We view this as an overall improvement, while accepting the loss of the personal touch. This is mitigated by community being welcoming in their Guestbook, and commenting on initial uploads.
The sub-text on the message says,
"This message remains for another xx days.
Then see bottom of panel on the left."
Although the link is intended to provide access after the main display period has ended, it also allows you to read the notes now.
2) Update: Encouraging guests to become Club Members.
In an attempt to encourage current guests to become Club Members, the programming now matches our Terms of Use. Once a guest reaches 100 images they will not be able to upload more. Previously, they could continue to upload, but the older ones were no longer accessible. The deletion of the excess images was a regular task for the team.
In order to upload further images, a guest will need to either become a club member or delete some of what they have already uploaded.
This update now applies the Terms of Use equitably tor everyone.
3) Our homepage in summer.
The ipernity homepage is our flagship for visitors from the web. With the start of summer, we are now showing summer images of club members. We invite you to enrich the attractiveness of our homepage with suitable new images. Please post them there: Ipernity Homepage - Image Proposals.
Currently, we are still showing the images from the 2023 summer season. Please let us know which ones should be kept and which ones should be replaced. Follow this link to watch the images and take part in the corresponding vote afterwards using the link in the description of this YouTube video.
4) In memoria.
Your ima team.
20 comments
Jaap van 't Veen said:
Bergfex said:
Kalli replied to Bergfex:
Jean-Paul replied to Bergfex:
Eric Desjours replied to :
Pearl said:
Je m'y suis peut-être mal prise.
A bientôt.
Bergfex replied to Pearl:
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paarvergleich
pollunit.com/de/paarweiser-vergleich
raingirl replied to :
The other confusing is to complete the voting and look at the results and see images that I didn't get to vote on.
So for me I find this somewhat annoying that this method doesn't give one the chance to rate all the images. Instead, if I understand correctly, a particular image will be shown randomly to some people and so it ends up that while we are asked to "vote" on the summer images (implying all of them), we really are giving our opinion on some of the images. It has the feel of statistics, and less that you are asking me for my personal opinion.
I read the links, and I understand the concept. I just wouldn't personally choose this option for this situation.
Pearl replied to :
Bergfex replied to :
As far as the confusion regarding the result is concerned, thank you for the hint insofar as any results shouldn't actually be visible during the voting. On the one hand, to prevent the result from being manipulated, and on the other, because not all image pairs were compared with each other in the initial phase.
I was able to remedy the latter problem immediately by editing the Poll Unit setting accordingly. The first problem, making the method more comprehensible by explaining it, takes some time. But I have already included at least a brief hint in the introductory text to the poll.
Bergfex replied to :
Team replied to :
ROL/Photo said:
Sarah O' said:
Team replied to Sarah O':
This puts a cookie on your device. So at some point the cookie was cleared, either as a deliberate act through the browser settings, or possibly due to a browser update. Also a new device, or a change of browser, could account for this.