data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c469/6c469bd352152d6d5d9a819ca4181fbb8c25684a" alt="The camera is dead, long live the camera! The camera is dead, long live the camera!"
I saw this rather interesting news shared on social media, and thought it may interest also peeps around here:
➽ Camera sales are falling sharply by Om Malik
So, supposedly phone cameras are taking over. Whether this is a bad or good thing depends on the point of view. Someone could call that as a "progress", and some may see it as a "paradigm shift". Or it can be even a "philosophical revolution".
We all can't be masters of photography and professionals, but that should not stop us from bringing beauty to our lives, share it, and seek for it on art of others. However, that of course should not cause much negative cons either, like pollution in form of energy wasted and tossed away outdated electronic applications, or selfish mishaps caused by taking for example selfies on railroad tracks.
In the late 1970s Susan Sontag saw photography as a way to live in the past, as an intention to record and preserve everyday life into collections of “jarred” memories. Today digital photography, and amateur photography on social media is more like a way of living, to experience and share the presence. Barely no one is interested on what someone else did last summer, unless it is presented today, as new to them, right now, and right on front of their faces. Only pictures posted today are interesting.
We could even see photography today with terms of "wabi sabi". The point then is not to try achieve something permanent, immortal and grand, but to enjoy the life as it would be a long tea ceremony. One cup of tea will not last forever, but you can always try to make some more of it.
24 comments
Valfal said:
Sami Serola (inactiv… replied to Valfal:
But they still does make possible such things as very extensive tele and choice of aperture. And on most of the phone cameras the user interface and usability are just crappy! For example lack of dedicated shutter button is the worst there is.
Frank J Casella said:
Sami Serola (inactiv… replied to Frank J Casella:
As Marshall McLuhan has said: "The medium is the message." And currently I wish to see where this medium leads us. It is sort of a researchers curiosity that drives me to make things.
Stormlizard said:
Phone cameras have become better but are verylimited in abillity as they only have 'Digital focus'
Sami Serola (inactiv… replied to Stormlizard:
The sad thing currently is that because of decreased markets, the prices of proper tools are increasing:
shotkit.com/camera-industry-stats
And that is bad news also for enthusiast amateur photographers.
Bergfex said:
She is currently deleting most pictures because they have become blurred, or the motif (our grandson) is no longer in the picture because of the shutter release delay. I took hundreds of shots in HighSpeed mode and already recognized during the quick review that many good shots are included. Tomorrow I'll develop a few.
Sami Serola (inactiv… replied to Bergfex:
William Sutherland said:
Sami Serola (inactiv… replied to William Sutherland:
Amelia replied to :
Spo said:
Sami Serola (inactiv… replied to Spo:
Good addition to this conversation. Yes, amateur photography indeed can be seen as a "barking contest" as well. So, we definitely should practice our listening skills as well.
Janet Brien said:
Fact is, by the end of our Vancouver Island trip I was taking more phone pictures than any others. I used my beloved Canon + 100mm macro lens only a few times in the entire 6 weeks. I did use my Sony a lot and enjoyed its versatility so much. Phones can take very good pictures now and with simple panoramas that look fabulous, it's hard not to use when there are perfect scenics for them.
Sami Serola (inactiv… replied to Janet Brien:
➽ 'Noise in your photos? Who cares...' by James Popsys: youtu.be/gxxrZhjo0TE
Maybe within 20 years digital noise becomes as vintage and preferred as film grain.