Recent changes in Flickr forced a lot of people to move out, in search of better virtual places to hang around.
Ipernity has a look and feel, familiar with the old Flickr. I decided to give it a try.
After a few months I realise you have to build a new network from scratch, it takes time and a lot of effort.
Flickr, on the other hand, corrected some of their worst mistakes, one gets acquainted to the new look.
At this moment I use them both.
Ipernity looks cleaner, a better platform for individual images. So far I presented just monochromes. It looks better than a mixture of monochrome and colour. Let me know if you have any comments.
9 comments
Janet Brien said:
Thanks for your article, it was nice to read! :)
PhLB - Luc Boonen said:
My problem with Flickr is the overkill of material, you can hardly view ones images one by one. The first impression is a tableau of images. Changes in color or style often disturb the harmony. Never had a problem with that before.
PhLB - Luc Boonen said:
PhLB - Luc Boonen said:
For the time being I try to make the best out of both worlds; hope to see you again soon!
PhLB - Luc Boonen said:
PhLB - Luc Boonen said:
Coldwaterjohn said:
PhLB - Luc Boonen said:
beverley said:
when oddly enough these other sites would have loved to emulate them and no doubt
envied the popularity of Flickr and now what has Flickr done ? copy these other sites
which is crazy. Ipernity is a good blend of their own originality and the good parts of
Flickr, I just hope they do not bow to the endless large graphic logos that for me were
horrible and ugly on flickr ... and keep to their rules which we all agreed too ... one
line comment awards that are optional and nothing more. Ipernity is friendly and I
think there is more interest in the quality of pictures and creativity than following
ego popularity ;-) has to be good oOo