After seeing several good members and friends close up shop and leave ipernity, I've decided to express my thoughts on this development...
Sure, ipernity has its issues, but what photo sharing site doesn't? I think that the photography community here on ipernity is much more alive and interactive than any other photo sharing site I've visited. Thanks to the many gifted and friendly photographers I met on ipernity over the past 2 1/2 years, I learned more about photography than I ever thought possible. I also learned to leave my fears of the technical aspects behind and explore the artistic side of me through this medium. I will forever be grateful to all of you who share your talent with me, and for the extremely appreciated support you give as I explore what little talent I have for the medium.
I am especially saddened whenever I see any member leave ipernity for Flickr. I still have an account there, but hardly use it except in the capacity of serving as a moderator in one of the largest groups there and visiting my friends in the doll community (the reason I originally joined Flickr). I find the photography community there rather like a large city; cold and impersonal.
It is here on ipernity where I met a photography community that behaves like one. It would crush me to see it die, especially if it's because of members who choose to leave because they mistakenly fear that the "ship" is sinking. When they do that, they contribute to making their fears our reality.
When the IP team updated us on their status, they were honest enough to admit their financial difficulties, and, if you read their message closely, they seem to be throwing out "feelers" to gauge the attitude of the members. If too many of us choose to withdraw the very support that they need to keep this site operating, then the IP team will have no choice but to either close down ipernity or sell it to the highest bidder. That being said, Team ipernity must make the committment to its members who support them to allow us to help them! When many members cannot renew their club memberships because a glitch in the system doesn't allow them to pay, then the IP team shoots itself in the foot!
Does it make sense to throw away a great photo sharing site that even many of the members who left acknowledge has the best interface of any other site of its kind? Or do we make every effort to help preserve a wonderful place to share our photos and hearts with each other? For me the choice is clear. If we who always loved ipernity would stick it out and contribute to saving it through our support, we can keep the community we love in one place, and continue to enjoy operating on the best interface in the cyber world for photo sharing.
And as for Team ipernity, don't let go of your devoted members; show us you care by making it easier to support you!!
17 comments
Stormlizard said:
I have never been a member of Flickr, it was one of the sites I tested and rejected when my previous Cyber Hone site owners Multiply gave all bloggers and photographer the boot as they wished to convert the site to an online Shopping Mall in South East Asia.
I found Flickr to be an enormous city filled with cold hearted people. Ipernity on the other hand was tiny but alive, after only 14 days as a free rider I decided to pay for the Pro, (Now Club) membership, I coughed up for two times two years. I had tried twelve other sites, none of them filled the bill.
I carried many ex Multiplyers over with me, nearly all are still here, a few left as they did not agree with the T O S regarding the use of registered or © material.
I have also made several new Cyber friends here.
I have commented a few times on the Team New Year blog adding or agreeing with several suggested methods of keeping the ship afloat.
I hope we can celebrate further New Tears here.
John.
Valfal replied to Stormlizard:
Stormlizard replied to :
Multiply was almost identical to Ipernity in functionality though the core was based on a different Algorithm. All I had been doing on MP could be done on IP
Peter Van Lom said:
Valfal replied to Peter Van Lom:
Pam J said:
I refuse.. and I was always told it was very rude.. to speak of the Funeral before the damned body was DEAD !!!! And yes.. I am also very aware and realistic.
I have been a major party in keeping another site that was "dead and buried" for the past 3+ years... I DO understand the problems .
The payment thing CAN be fixed ,maybe we need to keep telling them about it(I know some have) but a more concerted effort ?
Like you , I discovered the many years of love of this hobby didnt mean I had to be the best at it. People would laugh with me.. help me.. and maybe I would just once in a while be able to give something back.
I have found friends... I have been able to truly enjoy others photos and talents.
I am NOT going to "the funeral" yet.
I have never yet found that walking away solves a problem.. it just makes it alot harder for those who stay and try to make things work.
Valfal replied to Pam J:
LutzP said:
It may be worthwhile to establish a group of concerned users to exchange ideas and to get the attention of the team.
Thanks for posting your thoughts, Val.
Valfal said:
Jenny McIntyre said:
Valfal said:
I hope ipernity stays with us for a very long time; like you, I have made many friends on this site, and I would hate for our community to get disrupted.
Heidiho said:
"Where do we go to ...." - this cannot be the question.
We know Flickr, we know Panoramio, we know 500px, we know XYZ.....
all those are no alternative. We have to save this small, kind, familiar Iper community.
And damned, it's so cheap fee .... every lens is more expensive !
Clickity Click said:
Sami Serola (inactiv… said:
Valfal replied to Sami Serola (inactiv…: