I think things like that are more noticeable in the suburbs, Jean. The buildings are spiffier than the ones downtown, on the whole, and there's more space, fewer people, and consequently less garbage and litter. You notice the deviations from the suburban ideal pretty easily.
Thanks, George. Am interesting idea about the urban desert. Downtown would be the urban jungle. Anyway, suburbs are deserted. In Toronto I couldn't walk a block without meeting people, but here I can walk for several blocks without meeting anyone. As I did on Sunday when I took this.
This is the sort of area that I know exists, but has nothing for me - a sort of existential desert. Doors that won't open, an abandoned microwave. Other people were, even are, there, but they might as well have been on a different planet. There is no shelter here.
Sorry. I have a very low boredom threshold, and places like this trigger some sort of anxiety. You've done about all there is to do here - take its picture and hurry on.
It's backstage, Bob. The population density is so low in the burbs that any litter or seems like a desecration of the utilitarian buildings. Downtown it's just a natural part of the environment.
12 comments
Sarah P. said:
John FitzGerald replied to Sarah P.:
Jean said:
John FitzGerald replied to Jean:
William Sutherland said:
Admired in:
www.ipernity.com/group/tolerance
John FitzGerald replied to William Sutherland:
tiabunna said:
John FitzGerald replied to tiabunna:
rdhinmn said:
Sorry. I have a very low boredom threshold, and places like this trigger some sort of anxiety. You've done about all there is to do here - take its picture and hurry on.
Might this be even more desolate in b&w?
John FitzGerald replied to rdhinmn:
Keith Burton said:
John FitzGerald replied to Keith Burton: