A great picture - and, of course, a great ecological disaster.
Be aware, however, that this pic does not fully comply with the requirements of this month's CWP as it is asking for a (formerly) seaworthy vessel (which is present here) and a view on the water surface. It is up to you - and later to the voters - to decide whether your pic fits to the contest.
What was there, not, is what you see exactly on the image, I do not deny that what the photo can convey and a whole other thing, we talk about the topic proposed by Erhard Bernstein for this month in the CWP.
However, for fair play, between moderators, we leave, ..To You... the decision for the photo in the game, as you know you can participate with two photos (one per week)
good day
Loading
9 comments
Bob Taylor said:
Eunice Perkins said:
Don Sutherland said:
slgwv said:
Hubs 56 said:
Erhard Bernstein said:
Be aware, however, that this pic does not fully comply with the requirements of this month's CWP as it is asking for a (formerly) seaworthy vessel (which is present here) and a view on the water surface. It is up to you - and later to the voters - to decide whether your pic fits to the contest.
tommes replied to Erhard Bernstein:
franco benf replied to tommes:
However, for fair play, between moderators, we leave, ..To You... the decision for the photo in the game, as you know you can participate with two photos (one per week)
good day
J. Gafarot said:
It was a privilege.