Fair enough, but he'll tell you that because the white patch is at the edge it leads the eye away from the main subject (the blossom) and out of the picture. Likewise the cars.
But according to Roy, if the eye is drawn upwards towards the sky, it's bad.
Light areas catch the eye and draw the eye towards them, whatever the main focus of the picture is meant to be, and for that reason vignetting is used deliberately to keep the eye within the frame.
1. My focus of interest would be the blossom, which the title suggests it should be.
2. As we've discussed, such "rules" (like natural "laws") are not strictures; they are descriptions of what happens naturally, including what the human eye does when confronted with a particular composition and how the brain perceives what the eye sees. In that surely they're useful. And they're not "my" rules; Roy in fact is the first to apply them to MY pictures.
9 comments
Howard Somerville said:
Isisbridge replied to Howard Somerville:
as I like the white patch of light contrasting with the dark sky.
Just a serendipity snap as I was walking along.
Howard Somerville replied to Isisbridge:
Isisbridge said:
the main focus being the threatening grey sky over the street.
Howard Somerville replied to Isisbridge:
Light areas catch the eye and draw the eye towards them, whatever the main focus of the picture is meant to be, and for that reason vignetting is used deliberately to keep the eye within the frame.
Isisbridge replied to Howard Somerville:
Why must you have rules for everything?
Howard Somerville replied to Isisbridge:
2. As we've discussed, such "rules" (like natural "laws") are not strictures; they are descriptions of what happens naturally, including what the human eye does when confronted with a particular composition and how the brain perceives what the eye sees. In that surely they're useful. And they're not "my" rules; Roy in fact is the first to apply them to MY pictures.
Isisbridge replied to Howard Somerville:
Isisbridge said: