Loading

Elizabeth Street, Toronto

Four years old, but making its first public appearance,
Visible by: Everyone
(more information)

More information

Visible by: Everyone

All rights reserved

Report this photo as inappropriate

12 comments

Ulrich John said:

Nicely framed, John ! Like your view very much !
7 years ago

John FitzGerald replied to Ulrich John:

Thanks, Ulrich.
7 years ago

William Sutherland said:

Phenomenal cityscape!

Admired in:
www.ipernity.com/group/tolerance
7 years ago ( translate )

John FitzGerald replied to William Sutherland:

Thanks, William.
7 years ago ( translate )

Henry L ( k4eyv ) said:

Such an eclectic mash up of architecture ! I don't know if this lack of planning is good or not. Nicely done shot John !
7 years ago

John FitzGerald replied to Henry L ( k4eyv ):

Thanks, Henry. In Toronto they just throw 'em up. It does mean that downtown the streetscapes are higgledy-piggledy. If you take streetcar across Toronto and through downtown you'll notice that the streets in the older neighbourhoods (pre-WWII) have a much more consistent look.
7 years ago

Sarah P. said:

all the layers and colors of urban life ...
7 years ago

John FitzGerald replied to Sarah P.:

In Toronto the usual "colour" is grey, though, Sarah. This is atypical.
7 years ago

Keith Burton said:

An excellent city-scape John...............it all looks a bit random though, as if it was planned by a three-year old..!! I love those faces peeking round the edge of the building about two-thirds of the way down on the right :-)
7 years ago

John FitzGerald replied to Keith Burton:

Thanks, Keith. You and Henry are right on the money. Downtown Toronto is minimally planned. The city is mainly concerned about density. Developers delinerately propose over-ambitious developments, the city demands reductions, the developers reduce, and away we go! The only architecturally homogeneous part of downtown is the Toronto-Dominion Centre, and that was the bank's idea rather than the city's.

I'm glad you noticed the faces. I like them, too.
7 years ago

Phil Sutters replied to John FitzGerald:

Parts of London are like that now, quite apart from the atrocious City of London skyline with its show-off 'iconic' architectural eyesores. Sometimes it works at ground level if developers make the spaces in between attractive and easy to traverse.
7 years ago

John FitzGerald replied to Phil Sutters:

I can't speak about London in general, Phil, but certainly I agree wholeheartedly about the City.. I shudder to think what striking new building is next -- the Toilet Brush? the Teasmade? London Wall is now overbuilt to my eyes, too, but I suppose the commercial pressures to increase density were inexorable.
7 years ago