<no title>
English is a river. Its content is always changing and it has many tributaries. Its characteristics include impermanence. Indeed, there can be no single definition of the English language.
This conclusion applies across history and across countries. It's not only the language that's different now. So are the speakers. In the middle of the last century, around 400 million people spoke English. The total is now 1.5 billion, while the proportion of them living in Britain, North America and Australasia has declined. There is no historical parallel for this growth in English usuage and the shift in the language's center of gravity. English has become a global language not through any inherent virtues but because of the political and economic power of successively the British Empire and the United States. ~
More information
Visible by: Everyone
All rights reserved
-
Taken on Sunday September 25, 2016
-
Posted on Sunday September 25, 2016
- 214 visits
4 comments
Dinesh said:
Dinesh said:
We’ll begin with a box and the plural is boxes.
But the plural of ox should be oxen not oxes.
Then one fowl is goose, but two are called geese.
You may find a lone mouse or a whole lot of mice.
But the plural of house is houses not hice.
If the plural of man is always called men,
Why shouldn’t the plural of pan be called pen?
The cow in a plural may be cows or kine,
But the plural of vow is vows, not vine.
And I speak of foot and you show me your feet,
But I give you a boot. . . would a part be called beet?. . . . Page 94
Dinesh said:
Dinesh said: