Superb capture!

Admired in: www.ipernity.com/group/tolerance

I'm sure I've seen that flag before, in Northumberland.

And elsewhere.

Here's the original (.jpg).



To qualify for uploading, the shot needed more interest, centre-left.

Comparing the "before and after" versions would make a good "Spot the Difference" for the children's page of the TV Times. Try it, but I bet you'll miss one of the most prominent. If so, it'll be a tribute to its plausibility. (And it isn't one of the flags).

1. union flag

2. wall flag

3. extra window

4. car removed

5. yellow lines removed

6. post removed

7. bollard removed

8. white mark removed from roof

9. chimney pots added

10. cloned walker added

11. streetsign moved

12. sign added on lower wall

13. cropping

14. enhancement

You're supposed to tell the children HOW MANY they're looking for.

:
1. Correct
2. Correct
3. Correct (clone of the other window)
4. Correct
5. Correct
6. Correct
7. Correct (actually a vandalised, snapped-off tree)
8. Correct (a metal cowl)
9. Correct
10. Correct (she's a friend of mine)
11. Correct
12. Correct (removed from wall)
13. Correct
14. Correct (tonemapping)

Also vehicles and figures removed from background, lower left.

So 14 out of 15. Well done!

So what was this most prominent one I was going to miss?

3. (But you didn't).

So what was it?

3. - the extra window.

I would have thought that was one of the more obvious ones. You've done it very well,
but maybe you need to attend to that repeat of the white spot.

And can't you find a less droopy British flag?

To humour you, Clearasil now applied to the spot. Also, to humour Barbara, the lady lower left, I've (very laboriously) removed the metal barrier as well.

No, because unless they (like the American flag on the Moon) have wire frames supporting them, they do droop.

Do your lady friends mind being cloned?

Not entirely, though in reality she was close to that spot - by the arch. She said the picture was better without her, but I told her to let me be the judge of that.