Occasionally, I see the following message displayed beneath some members' photos:
So I asked myself whether AI could photograph.
Initially, I answered no, but after recently encountering an AI-controlled humanoid robot in a neighboring town that was busy photographing, I had to correct myself.
I could hardly believe my eyes. It was photographing with a
Paragraphica context-to-image (AI) camera, created by Bjørn Karmann.
So I’m labeling the image as follows:
The aforementioned AI 'camera' does exist, but the story about encountering the humanoid robot is, of course, as fictional as the misleading claim that AI can 'photograph.' :)
Considering that most of our cameras likely have AI-powered detection technology developed using deep learning technology, can we seriously still argue that our photos are free of AI?
If you have any thoughts on AI on ipernity, please join the discussions in the group AI on ipernity - Discussion Group.
These discussions are intended to help reach a viable decision for ipernity.
48 comments
William Sutherland said:
Admired in: www.ipernity.com/group/tolerance
*Уαɾα replied to William Sutherland:
Dave C said:
Happily my camera has no AI. ;-D
Nicole Merdrignac said:
RHH said:
Ghislaine said:
Une seule certitude : nous avons le choix du sujet, du cadrage.
La question que je me pose au sujet de L'IA : pourquoi nous presente-t-on tant de sujets anthropomorphes, une tête, un tronc, une paire de bras avec des mains et une paire de jambes avec des pieds ?
Jocelyne Villoing said:
Bonne journée *Yara.
Günter Klaus said:
Wünsche noch einen schönen Tag,liebe Grüße Güni :))
tiabunna said:
Patrick Brandy said:
Nouchetdu38 said:
RHH said:
Franck Chabal said:
Annemarie said:
Christian C said: