Loading

Homepage Redesign Study (2)

[EN] Revised version of www.ipernity.com/doc/team/45656792 with respect to all comments and suggestions for improvement. You're invitetd to mention further aspects, which have not yet been covered by the previous discussions.

******************************

[FR] Version révisée de www.ipernity.com/doc/team/45656792 en ce qui concerne tous les commentaires et suggestions d'amélioration. Vous êtes invité à mentionner d'autres aspects qui n'ont pas encore été couverts par les discussions précédentes.

******************************

[DE] Überarbeitete Version von www.ipernity.com/doc/team/45656792 unter Berücksichtigung aller Kommentare und Verbesserungsvorschläge. Ihr seid herzlich eingeladen, weitere Aspekte einzubringen, die in den vorhergehenden Diskussionen möglicherweise übersehen wurden.
Visible by: Everyone
(more information)

More information

Visible by: Everyone

Attribution + no derivatives

Report this photo as inappropriate

45 comments

Gudrun said:

Looks good to me, compliments and thank you!
7 years ago

Xata said:

Same remark as for the white background of our pages... IMHO and I know now that I am a minority, a medium grey would be more elegant and suitable for photo than this rough clinical white.
I prefer the previous version you proposed, no doubt it was more classy.
This one really disappoints me...
7 years ago

Team said:

Hi Xata!
I know your opinion. It's mine, too. But even as the creator of this redesign study and process leader I had to yield the majority. I did it with a heavy heart . . .
Bernhard (ima)
7 years ago

Xata replied to Team:

It is difficult sometimes not to think as the majority...
7 years ago

William Sutherland said:

Beautiful redesigned front page!

Admired in:
www.ipernity.com/group/tolerance
7 years ago

* ઇઉ * said:

Top, even though I would also prefer a medium grey background.
But one question. A three-month trial period, isn't that a little long? Normally, a maximum of 14 days is granted. My recommendation would therefore be a test period of no more than one month.
Anyway, a really great job, Bernhard. Many thanks to you and the IMA team!
7 years ago

Team replied to * ઇઉ *:

Hi * ઇઉ * !
Let's focus on the design here and regard the "3 month" as a wildcard here. The membership differentiation is a very complex topic, which will be discussed separately next year.
Bernhard (ima)
7 years ago

dgmphoto said:

Looks good to me. Thank you for all the time you are spending.
7 years ago

Manu said:

Almost there :-)

– 'news' and 'sign in' should not look like buttons, they are links. They could be styled like the 3 big links further down (light blue background with a darker shade)

– If there is a button next to the search field it should be called 'search'

– 'more than simply photo sharing...' -> what I'm reading is: it's not simple.
I can't come up with THE slogan right now, but I'm confident that somebody will.

"member owned" sounds too clumsy, but it's what makes ipernity special.

– Change 'Copyright: Leo W.' to '© Leo W.'

– I agree that the trial period should be shorter. 14 days, or maybe 1 month. Shorten the text to "Test all functions ..."?

– Membership: "Enjoy the complete offer" is not clear to me.

– I'd put more white space above the horizontal line at the bottom. Maybe the same distance as below the big photo?

Thank you everybody who is working for the future of ipernity <3

[The photo you are using is a bit wider than 1220x680]
7 years ago

Team replied to Manu:

Hi Manu!
"news" and "sign in" are buttons. You have to click onto them to get (1) directly to the team blog with the news and (2) to the log-in site. (1) might appear in a signal colour, when news are on hand. The "search"-frame isn't a button, but a frame to write in directly.
The title is the result of the very complex discussion with many contributes. (One half of the participants wanted to write down everything here. The other half remembered to the KISS principle. Some did it suchlike forcefully, that the result was completely characterless at the end.) The decision was influenced by Stephen Covey's method of finding a creative alternative, if a compromise isn't possible because the positions are contradicting. And it follows the AIDA principle, not to give descriptions or answers while advertising, but to make people curious. / Copyright: good idea. / Period: will be decided next year. / Membership: Better proposal? / Space: Will be regarded. / Photo size: This is a Photoshop draft only. There still are some more inaccuracies, like the cast shadow. It's not the final version, which will be made very precisely by a professional agency with adequate tools.
Bernhard (ima)
7 years ago

* ઇઉ * replied to Manu:

Agreeing to the proposed amendment of the copyright notice.
7 years ago

HappySnapper said:

Much better, short and to the point, arouses shop window interest.
Re trial membership time, I agree with others and three months is to long to let a prospective customer browse the shop. I think one month is plenty for a trial.
7 years ago

Team replied to HappySnapper:

To all:
Don't get stuck at the 3 months, please. The period isn't important for the design. It will be discussed again and finally decided separately next year.
Bernhard (ima)
7 years ago

* ઇઉ * replied to Team:

Okay, thank you, Bernhard.
7 years ago

Manu said:

Hi Bernhard

> are buttons

No. A button = a function, like "start search"

What you describe is a link = go to another page
7 years ago