Loading
Comparing photo sharing web sites
Recent changes on Panoramio made me to look for Panoramio alternatives.
So I've made some review about these alternatives...
You know what's going on Panoramio. Site development has stopped about year ago, some new bugged features are left as they are, now there is total dropout of communication with development team (is there any team at all?)... Suggested road ahead to Views need not to suit well for everybody.

So I've decided to look around to find out what can be used as photosharing site instead of favourite Panoramio.

To make decision based on fact and not emotions, I've designed this sheet comapring feature by feature some well (and some less) known photosharing sites. If you understand your preferences ;-), you can evaluate what's the best for you.

groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/panoramio-questions-support/hJl8FF4mLzQ

Sheet (still under "construction") covers at the moment sites like 500px, Flickr, ipernity, Panoramio and less known Zonerama. As I have not spent much time exploring the sites except Panoramio (and now ipernity), some features are not yet filled in, or there can be some mistakes.

I invite you to participate in this review - suggestions, filling the gaps, corrections of eventual mistakes welcome!
Share you thoughts in the discussion on Panoramio, or below this article.

2 comments

LutzP said:

Great job, Tomas, very comprehensive and detailed. I think to 24€ per year are well invested, because this is a well maintained platform and peope and servers need to be payed. It is less than a mediocre UV filter and I spend much more for equipment I rarely use ;-)
10 years ago

Tomas K☼h☼ut replied to LutzP:

You are right, Lutz... to pay for the photo site service is merely "mental" barrier.
As you see - I am already in club.
10 years ago