Loading
So you want to -- add SUPER-powers to your Nikon- or Canon-dSLR-camera
Here is the "dream" solution"

Compare that to the most practical, cheapest yet easiest & most reliable solution: /stargazer95050/31956033
The downside of it : it is HEAVY & BULKY, has additional components
But it is reliable, has been tested and is not expensive when you assemble it yourself. You can find an off-the-shelf solution when you look in the car-accessory ("jump start battery AC inverter"). Similar, you can find useful gear when searching for "Power Tank" .

There are a couple of solutions in between and my "Canon-fodder" is one of them. Adapting that to Nikon isn't difficult. My solution wasn't cheap, mainly because of the Li-Ion battery but by now, the battery prices now have come down.
When a camera has a DC-input, but you cannot find a matching connector, it may just as well not be there. davidkinghamphotography and many others have circumvented that issue by using dummy batteries and my modification for the Canon is not much different. The price for those dummies varies and it may be even worth it to buy an AC-adapter just to get the "dummy"

Building a near-perfect solution
Like David Kingham said, buy the cheapest EH-5 and dump the AC power supply. My approach differed a bit. I've purchased a cheap (vertical) battery grip and add the DC/DC to the inside : stargazer95050/29098819 The "dummy-battery / grip" option has the advantage of powering cameras _WITHOUT_ a DC input plug (and there are many)



PERSONALLY, I still prefer the "dummy-battery in grip" approach for one important reason -- fewer external components and all electronic components are shielded from nasty weather. Even simple dew can short a circuit. When you look at my example, you see there is only a single 2.1mm x 5.5mm connector and that is the 12V input. No danger of accidentally mixing up the lower 7.5V voltage with the 12V.

You can choose the "dummy-battery" without the extra grip -- but Nikon didn't have the foresight to include a rubber seal for the DC-cable. Canon has such seals and even the cheap 3rd-party OEM-grip has it. Drilling a hole into a $30 grip is less risky than putting a $1500 ... $3500 camera under the knife.


You can increase the capacity a lot and reduce the price by using a Lead-Acid battery. Size & weight vary, as do the connectors. Don't forget to add a 12V battery charger. In terms of Wh / dollar, these batteries are hard to beat. In terms of Wh / weight, the Lead-Acid are on the loosing side.

The suggestion I outlined above uses a common 12V input (within broad tolerances) and you can choose the right power-/battery-source and still keep the same converter.
In many cases you may even be able to keep the same battery & converter and just swap one "dummy" for another as long as they all are 7.4V (with is quite common)


Picking 12V as the common "rail" / intermediate voltage isn't such a bad idea. Not only do cars use it, it also is widely used in Astronomy and many DIY projects. Chances are, you find more 12V power supplies than for any other DC voltage.



Comparing the DIY against the $$$ PRO-EQUIPMENT
============================================

My challenger is this : www.ipernity.com/doc/315163/29135587
A DIY combo made from a 20Ah 12V Li-Ion battery plus a DC/DC-converter inside a (cheap vertical) battery grip -- and this thing works in my telescope setup.

One popular choice by professionals is the "Vagabond Mini Lithium" with its embedded 12V 8.8Ah battery [www.paulcbuff.com/manuals/vmini.pdf] and given its 120V AC-outputs, the Vagabond is more flexible. OTOH, if you know in advance that you want to power cameras and the like, the Vagabond approach wastes a lot of energy (and thus battery lifetime) by first amplifying 12V to 120V AC only to subsequently reduce the 120V AC down to 7.4V, 9V or even 12V DC -- this choice doesn't require any DIY !! And it also is compatible with any (low-power) equipment you have. The very compact & attractive design of the "Vagabond" with the elegant combination of converter/base-unit and the replaceable-battery are good reasons for its popularity.


The "Vagabond" and similar are multi-purpose devices.
The solution I am suggestion is INTENTIONALLY NOT MULTI-PURPOSE -- by skipping the whole 120V-AC stage, this converter is more efficient and also a lot smaller. You can fit the DC/DC converter into the volume a regular 12V DC-plug (cigarette lighter + bigger plug) would require.
Nevertheless -- 8.8Ah versus the 20.0Ah is a significant disadvantage for the "Vagabond Li". To power a SLR, the Vagabond requires the built-in AC-inverter plus a 120V AC to DC-converter (Camera's AC power-supply).

It is possible to save a lot of power by skipping these high-power up- & down conversions and use a "simple" DC/DC converter to generate 9V (or 7.4V) from the 12V battery. Not only is the converter much, much smaller, also it eliminates the need for bulky 120V AC-plugs. And did I mention the lower price ?? -- the battery ranges from $30...$150 and the DC/DC converter is ~ $10. The Vagabond starts at $240 (plus S&H & tax)




© Copyright 2014, All rights reserved -- post a link to this page or contact me, if you want to use it in your blog or publication or if you want a (large) print

1 comment

Stargazer95050 said:

One possible "ideal" solution for people who cannot or don't want to solder their own power supply : www.amazon.com/OXA-13000mah-Multi-functional-Blackberry-Paperwhite/dp/B00H93GVB8/ref=sr_1_8 -- there are two caveats.
1) The stated output voltage is 8.4V instead of the nominal 7.4V. Maybe because that is the voltage used to charging batteries ==> I cannot tell if the electronics inside the camera tolerate that higher voltage. Also, a user may accidentally switch to even higher voltage settings and that can do even more damage
2) One still needs to find or customize a cable to connect to the camera or adapt to the dummy battery
10 years ago