Loading
The Camera’s Twilight?
Technological innovation occurs at the confluence of knowledge and imagination. Technology then shrinks, merges, and often reappears inside something more powerful. Devices that once dominated homes, offices, and studios fade when their functions are absorbed by smaller, cheaper, more capable systems.

Television moved from bulky furniture built around broadcast programming to thin, networked screens connected to streaming, gaming, video calls, apps, and on-demand entertainment. Computers followed a similar path. Mainframes gave way to desktops, desktops to laptops, and laptops to tablets and smartphones. The computer did not disappear. It dissolved into everyday life and became a portable intelligence layer carried in the pocket.

Storage media show the same pattern. Floppy disks, CDs, DVDs, external drives, and memory cards once seemed essential. But as storage became smaller, denser, cheaper, and more networked, the physical object receded. Files moved from disks to drives, from drives to flash memory, and from flash memory to invisible cloud systems.

This is a recurring law of technological change: as power increases and size decreases, separate devices are pulled into larger platforms. The clock, calculator, map, music player, flashlight, notebook, scanner, recorder, and video camera all became smartphone features. Specialized tools survive among professionals and enthusiasts, but the mass market moves toward convergence.

The camera is now undergoing the same transformation. For more than a century, it was a distinct object that had to be purchased, carried, protected, and learned. Quality depended on lenses, sensors or film, exposure settings, lighting, timing, and skill. But smartphone cameras now combine better sensors, multiple lenses, faster processors, stabilization, night mode, portrait mode, high dynamic range processing, and computational photography. What once required a dedicated camera, tripod, flash, lens kit, darkroom, or editing workstation is increasingly handled by a device that also manages nearly every other part of modern life.

Now, the combination of artificial intelligence (AI) and smartphone cameras is disrupting photography. The application of AI now makes it possible for photographs taken by smartphones to match or even surpass the quality of those taken by high-end cameras. Below are four photos taken by a smartphone and then processed through AI.

Photos: Clockwise from top left: Franconia, NH (July 29, 2025), Portsmouth, NH (July 27, 2025), Metropolitan Museum of Art (July 12, 2025), Marble House at Newport, RI (July 22, 2025)

Below is a photo of the Puning Temple in Chengde, China taken on August 8, 2024 with an iPhone.


This is just the beginning of an emerging revolution in photography. In the coming years, AI capture assistants will likely become standard features in advanced smartphone cameras. They will help users choose portrait, document, artwork, night, macro, and action modes. They will lock focus, optimize exposure, detect blur risk, capture multiple frames, and fuse them into a stronger final image. They will make ordinary users dramatically better photographers without requiring them to understand ISO, shutter speed, white balance, focal length, aperture, or dynamic range.

Eventually, smartphone cameras may become full visual intelligence systems. These systems will not merely record light. They will understand intent. They will recognize whether a user is trying to photograph a painting through glass, a passport document under poor lighting, a moonlit skyline, a fast-moving child, a flower at macro distance, or a museum object behind a reflective case. They will guide framing, optimize capture, anticipate problems, collect supporting frames, and complete the image with AI-aware editing before the user ever opens a separate app.

At that point, the camera will no longer be just a device for taking pictures. It will become a creative partner.

The result will be more than an upgrade to photography. It will be a democratization of photographic creation. The moats that once protected professional-quality image-making such as expensive equipment, technical training, specialized software, studio access, and years of trial and error, will dissolve.

That shift will threaten anyone whose advantage depends mainly on tool ownership, technical scarcity, or gatekeeping. Photographers whose value rests primarily on superior cameras, lenses, lighting rigs, studio setups, or editing workflows may find their traditional advantage weakening. When a person with a phone, a prompt, and strong visual imagination can produce striking images, the market will ask a harder but better question: What do you see that others do not?

The best photographers will adapt. Their value will rest less on equipment and more on judgment, taste, direction, narrative, trust, authenticity, and lived experience.

Camera manufacturers, stock photography companies, commercial studios, and traditional art-world gatekeepers may resist this change. But society as a whole will benefit. The largest beneficiaries will be ordinary creators. People who could never afford professional cameras, lighting equipment, studio space, models, travel, or years of technical training will gain new expressive power. A student, small business owner, teacher, activist, writer, or amateur artist will be able to create images that once required large budgets.

The barrier to entry will shift from money to imagination. In this new world, photography will no longer belong mainly to those who own the best camera or the most powerful post-processing software. It will belong to those with the clearest vision, the strongest taste, the most original imagination, and the best judgment about what an image should mean.

8 comments

William Sutherland said:

Awesome and so true! AI is revolutionizing everything for the better!
4 weeks ago

Annemarie said:

thanks for this Don, very interesting .
Not sure for the better, but anyway........ my grandchildren will experience it
4 weeks ago

William Sutherland said:

To further demonstrate this, when Don and I went to NYBG yesterday afternoon, I suggested we capture a small water fall with the our cell phones and then utilize AI to create a silky water effect. When Don made the request, AI (ChatGPT specifically) failed on the first attempt. However, it was a quick learner. On the second attempt, it succeeded. :) Don then asked ChatGPT to write a prompt so that additional photos could be converted in this way. With the AI-provided prompt, Don tested it on another photo with success! I then used the same prompt and sent the below left photo to CoPilot AI to see if the prompt worked with other AIs. It did, leading to the lower photo on the right! :)

For Comment

With this photographic breakthrough one no longer needs a camera with manual controls, a sturdy tripod, neutral density (ND) filter, circular polarizer (CPL) filter and remote shutter release cable saving between $170-$560 (camera excluded) while eliminating the need to carry bulky equipment. :) Best of all, it levels the playing field! :)

Last, this is the AI-generated prompt:

Transform the provided photograph into a natural, high-quality landscape image with a convincing slow-shutter effect applied only to the running water.

Preserve the original scene, composition, plants, rocks, lighting direction, colors, and natural atmosphere. Do not add or remove major objects. Remove any people if visible.

Apply a long-exposure / slow-shutter effect to the moving water so waterfalls, streams, cascades, and flowing sections appear silky, smooth, mist-like, and softly blurred. The water should look as if photographed with a tripod and a slow shutter speed, around 1–4 seconds, or longer where appropriate. The flowing water should have soft white ribbons, gentle motion trails, and a smooth glassy surface in calmer pools.

Keep all non-moving elements sharp and natural: rocks, plants, leaves, branches, soil, banks, and surrounding landscape should remain stable, detailed, and realistic. Avoid blurring the entire image. The slow-shutter effect should be localized to the water only.

Maintain natural colors. Do not oversaturate the greens or make the water unnaturally blue. Preserve realistic daylight, natural shadows, and the original garden atmosphere. Improve clarity, exposure balance, contrast, and detail while keeping the result believable and photographic.

Final image: a serene, natural garden or woodland water scene with crisp surroundings and softly blurred, silky running water, resembling a professional long-exposure landscape photograph.
4 weeks ago

Amelia said:

I must post a photo of myself after AI has dealt with it. Maybe I could catch a date from a 21 year old.

Are you suggesting that we throw away our cameras? We can all stop looking at real views and enjoying them.
4 weeks ago

Don Sutherland replied to Amelia:

I see a broadening of photography, but do not believe AI will replace the individual experience, human creativity, personal artistic expression, etc. It will augment what people do and how they express themselves.
4 weeks ago

William Sutherland said:

Amelia, we can still enjoy all the real views with cell phones much of the time. Also, using AI to create such an effect is no different and no less real than using the tripod, filters and remote control cable to create such an effect that originally was not there.
4 weeks ago

Colin Ashcroft said:

Thought provoking and very interesting. I take your point about the advantages for the general population that could not afford or would never be (or perhaps that should be would never of thought of) buying lots of cameras, lenses, tripods , film, filters etc. and the systems, software, apps to edit.

I have been watching the rapid change in the technology and changes in their use all my life. I have blindly embraced some of these things and others I have thought longer and harder about. I sometimes stop in my tracks and think yes I could do this but is it really necessary.

One of the things is why do I take and store so many photographs here on Ipernity and on other cloud storage? Most are of no interest to anyone but me and many are not even worth saving. I watch the memorial pages and think yes one day that will be me and there will be no more new photos from me. If I could change my ways I would use Delete more , Edit less and Post one in one hundred. Just think of the cloud storage space saved.

The main thought I come back to is, Just because I can do this new thing, should I?

As long as there is still choice and the new technology is explained (Pros and Cons) clearly and not invisible to the user I have no issue with this kind of progress.

Regrets relating to technological change I have many:

Wasting money on Music CDs especially a short period of discarding Vinyl copies - I soon stopped that. CDs are in storage, Vinyl gets played,

Wasting money and years of effort both at work and at home on Microsoft Windows systems after Windows 98 second edition. From 2001 at home at least Apple systems.

Making mistakes about backups both lost copies and copies that will not read ( formats that seemed like a good idea at the time ). I have lost all my RAW files from 2007-2009 for example but at least that saves more cloud storage.

I have a working VHS player but discarded, binned, threw away 95% of the VHS tapes I ever had. I bought other ‘more advanced’ systems that were here today and gone tomorrow formats. I never kept these systems or even used them very often.

Cameras. I was slow to try digital seriously until after 2006 but not slow to try mirrorless, more money and perhaps at least some time and effort wasted.

Cars: I bought a car in 2017, I do wonder if it will be my last car, I think it may be. I was very excited about it as it had all kinds of special technology, it can read road signs and tell me with a chime about speed restrictions i like that. It has many more features such as SatNav (I haven’t used very often at all - perhaps I don't like following orders). It can parallel park with my hands off the steering, I haven’t tried that again after the first few months after purchase. It beeps a ‘possible’ collision alert at me for the slightest and sometimes the most baffling reasons. It can keep me driving straight in narrow lanes and warn me to stop and have a coffee if it thinks I am getting tired. What fun, but seriously more wasted money on bells and whistles other than that speed restriction reminder chime which I like.

Technology and the drive for change, mostly for good I think but not all of it.

Apologies for going off topic a little in this.
3 weeks ago

Don Sutherland replied to Colin Ashcroft:

Wonderful commentary, Colin. I strongly favor choice. Choice is freedom. The benefits of technology should diffuse widely without compromising what it means to be human, to live, to express oneself, etc., even if the path in that direction is not always clear.
3 weeks ago