Loading
L'Affaire
Qu'est-ce que beaucoup te scandalise dans l'image d'un pénis en érection?
La représentation effrontée de quelque chose qui est ce qui simplement est,
ou très plus probablement,
la peur des pensées obscènes et vicieux que la vision de cette image insinue et déclenche dans ton petit, vieil esprit, bigot et sale?

9 comments

Giorgio Bree said:

Les pages spéciales traitent seulement de ce,
les pages normales incluent celui-là aussi.
Je n'accepte pas le puritanisme bigot de certains gens que,
puis dans la réalité pensent et font vraiment beaucoup pire.

OUI, à la photo d'un enfant mort,
NON, à celle d'un pénis ( entre autre messe en privé )

La vie n'est pas seulement rose, fleurs et chiens que chient dans la neige.
5 years ago ( translate )

Belleuse said:

Hi, Giorgio.
In my opinion - this type of photo, referred to above, in painting would be called "naturalism".
In painting, it isn't the art of the highest flight, at the highest level, although it requires very good mastering of the craftsmanship by the artist.
On the other hand, the nudity and photography of one's own body is already so rich in tradition that unfortunately, it isn't easy to be original and interesting photography only by directing the camera to its own intimate sphere.
The point here is, in my opinion, the question: can you really show "life" in some innovative way by showing what you are talking about? One can imagine that in this way someone could argue for showing excrement, faeces, or photos of childbirth, in the operating room. This is also life ...
Only - who would like to see it and how does it apply to the tradition of photography?
Probably not everyone who doesn't want to see and appreciated photo with an erected penis is a puritan and not everyone makes "worse things" in life. There is still (I hope) the concept of "borders of intimacy" - a certain culture of life, social culture and individual feeling. You can say: culture versus nature ... ;-) But cultural taboos didn't come out "of nowhere"and as you know - they also have a protective function.

When I am looking for a place on the Internet for photography, I expect something that is related to photography as art, in other words: I expect creativity, a bit of photo work and, if possible, minimal artistry.
If the photo portal (what I was thinking about the Iper, and there were more artists here at the beginning) does not offer what seems to be the reason for its existence - interesting photos - I'm a bit disappointed. But it's my personal opinion of course. :-)
5 years ago

Giorgio Bree replied to Belleuse:

Of course!
5 years ago

Belleuse said:

Btw. do you know this article by William S. : www.ipernity.com/blog/285927/4616612 ?
I hope it will be interesting to your article also. And this group: www.ipernity.com/group/no-censorship
5 years ago

Giorgio Bree replied to Belleuse:

Thank you.
5 years ago ( translate )

Colette NoËl said:

Bonsoir, Giorgio ! Tu as tout à fait raison !
La beauté, comme la laideur et hélas, le vice, sont dans l'œil de celui qui regarde ! Tout comme le Tartuffe de Molière qui lançait son "couvrez ce sein que je ne saurais voir", sans pour autant le quitter du regard !
Je préfère pour ma part voir un pénis en érection qu'un enfant mort, une chose qui malheureusement s'est banalisée . . .
3 years ago ( translate )

Giorgio Bree replied to Colette NoËl:

Heureux d’apprendre que tu es comme peu !
3 years ago ( translate )

Belleuse said:

Some people seems to be really blind for what is the beauty... How pity.
3 years ago

Giorgio Bree replied to Belleuse:

I agree with you.
Really blind.............and bigot!
3 years ago