Loading
1-1_3-1-1-3

I created the header image because the United States is facing its greatest threat ever – a coup that will forever destroy the Constitution, extinguish freedom and have significant, profound and lasting consequences for not only America but the entire world as human dignity and fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, thought, religion and life are eliminated and governments determine and control the dissemination of information, shape our individual destiny and even decide who may have offspring through population control measures.

After the first coup attempt to seize control of the U.S. presidency characterized by calls to “Resist!” (obviouisly the will of the people) that ran from 2016 to early 2019 failed, a second and more virulent attempt began on 25 September 2019 even though President Trump, like him or hate him, has committed no wrongdoing.

Alarmingly conditions are ideal that it may succeed unless elected leaders rediscover patriotism and courage to resist it since:

1. The Unites States is so divided, the “most significant barrier to a coup d’état” has been eliminated such that half the population would welcome and celebrate such an “un-American” development. Historian Andrew Janos’ premise – “A coup d’état in the United States would be too fantastic to contemplate… because the bulk of the people are strongly attached to the prevailing political system and would rise in defense of a political leader even though they might not like him” – is no longer valid.[1]

2. “Mainstream” media has lost its objectivity and now indoctrinates the population with the views and ideology of the coup plotters (un-elected deep state bureaucrats and their congressional pawns) to facilitate the president’s overthrow and reduce potential protest and resistance.

3. The second amendment is under attack to eliminate the ability to resist coups and totalitarianism and efforts are being made to create an Internet “kill switch” to ensure a total blackout of timely objective information that might be necessary to defend freedom.

Furthermore, the United States has already crossed the threshold where the constitution is no longer respected with attempts by many to distort and manipulate it to address their ideological objectives, people are subjected to verbal and physical attacks because of their opinions and beliefs, life itself or at least some lives do not matter and a misguided “cultural revolution” is underway that seeks to purge the U.S. of her history and landmarks and eliminate fundamental values sacrosanct to the American way. The words of Samuel Adams, a Founding Father and signer of the Declaration of Independence are and ought to be as true now as they were back in 1776 – “The people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government and to reform, alter, or totally change… it” – not the un-elected deep state, politicians and/or other coup plotters. And this change, to protect and preserve the U.S. constitution, which is the sworn duty of every elected official, must be made through the ballot box. Anything else is a dangerous dissolution of constitutional law and per Samuel Adams (1722-1803), such a “dissolution of principles… will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy” even if one cannot see this. With 2020 only a year away, I can only hope and pray that prudence will prevail and the people, people alone will determine who runs the American government. And remember, if one coup succeeds, it will make it easier for another one and so on.
______________
[1]
Glen Harlan Reynolds. Of Coups and the Constitution. 28 September 2019. 133, 137.

17 comments

J.Garcia said:

I think if there are true facts that don't comply with the Constitution, Trump could be fired.
Not the first US president to be dismissed, William
4 years ago

William Sutherland replied to J.Garcia:

Yes, J. Garcia -- if there were true facts which there are not. I never supported the impeachment of President Clinton and was happy when he wasn't removed from office. Also, even though I wasn't alive when Andrew Johnson was impeached, I'm glad too he wasn't removed from office since he had every right to fire his "War Secretary" as he chose, which was the basis for his impeachment.
4 years ago

©UdoSm said:

Hello William, I appreciate your opinion and don't want to get too close to you, but at the beginning of 2019 I read on NTV:

Trump lies and lies...
730 days have passed since Donald Trump's inauguration - and it has already given rise to much-discussed misinformation. Statisticians have recounted: On average, the US president tells eight lies a day from the highest office.

In my opinion, this is not the kind of behaviour that a president of your honourable country should be have.
Given the economic damage he has caused to the world and the new crises in world politics he has brought about, it is time for a new and honourable president to come to the head of the United States.
4 years ago

William Sutherland replied to ©UdoSm:

I understand a lot of people have a great dislike for President Trump especially because of his brashness, tweets (I personally wish he would put aside Twitter) and so forth and it is their free choice and right. 2020 should be the year for them to exercise this through the ballot box. While I will admit, President Trump does at times lie or exaggerate, I believe that stat is also an exaggeration. At the same time, pols from the other side also lie. Both sides shouldn't engage in this behavior! However, considering we no longer have a purely objective press, it is difficult to get accurate information. The terms "fake news" and "misinformation" are appropriate since neither side wants to report news that doesn't support their political viewpoint.

Also, I respectfully disagree he has caused economic damage in the world nor political crises. Every president faces their share of crises and he isn't exempt. I can't say he has always handled them well (e.g. North Korea, Iran) but neither did President Obama, nor W. Bush nor Reagan, nor Carter, etc. They are imperfect human beings after all.

Last, your statement, "I appreciate your opinion and don't want to get too close to you" is part of the mindset that has let to lack of civility in today's society, but it is your choice, which I also respect. As for me, I respect the diversity of people (age, gender, nationality, etc.) as well as differences of opinion, religion, culture, etc. but choose not disassociate myself from people who are different than me and/or have different opinions, religious beliefs, culture, etc.

I go by the public domain anonymous saying, "Open-minded people don't impose their beliefs on others. They accept all of life's perspectives and realities, doing their own thing in peace" since in the words of Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882), "We are of different opinions... but we always may be said to be at heart on the side of truth."
4 years ago

Don Sutherland said:

Interesting commentary. IMO, the facts and evidence, alone, should determine the appropriate course of action.
4 years ago

©UdoSm replied to Don Sutherland:

Hi Don, what means IMO ?
4 years ago

William Sutherland replied to Don Sutherland:

Of course, if you're going to investigate Trump, the other side needs to also be investigated since there is plenty of fodder there too, Don. I would hope you could at least agree with this premise since it can't be like the Mueller investigation where he investigated possible collusion with Russia on Trump's part and never even spent a second looking at Hillary Clinton's involvement with Russia re: the "Dirty Dossier" and the Uranium One deal. Consistency is critical and right now there are two standards of justice, a very dangerous development for America.
4 years ago

Don Sutherland replied to :

The acronym "IMO" stands for "in my opinion."
4 years ago

dolores666 said:

Excellent article, William. We, across the pond are going through a process so like the one described that makes me think about crappy trends, and black tides and other even less pleasant things. Ay que dolor...:-(
4 years ago

Don Sutherland replied to :

4 years ago

William Sutherland said:

Yes, I know Dolores. Let's say I'm glad Boris Johnson cannot suspend parliament since like the overthrow of a leader, such a move is also anti-democratic.
4 years ago

Frank J Casella said:

Thanks William for writing about this important subject. We also need a Trump like figure here in Chicagoland to upset the corruption. I agree with you that we are all human and have our own falts, and I believe Trump's life experiences have 'trained' him for such a time as this. I also agree with you that he should move off Twitter to some other to have a better platform. Just seeing how Americans disrespect the Flag says everything.
4 years ago

William Sutherland said:

Thank you Frank. Your last sentence pretty much sums it up how many Americans do not have the best interests of the country at heart and want to create something different that will not be for the better.
4 years ago

Bergfex said:

Ich habe immer gesagt: Mein größtes Glück ist, dass ich mein ganzes bisheriges Leben in einem Land ohne kriegerische Auseinandersetzung leben durfte. Ob es so etwas in 50 Jahren überhaupt noch gibt? Auf der ganzen Welt wird gezündelt, ohne an das Danach zu denken.
4 years ago ( translate )

William Sutherland said:

I couldn't have said it better. I can only hope that some how reason prevails and everything people around the world have worked so hard for and at such a great cost in lives -- democracy, freedom and peace -- will endure. I'm afraid if the U.S. succumbs to a coup instead of waiting a mere year for elections, ruling parties engage in revenge prosecutions (eliminating any incentive for peaceful transfers of power) we will throw away 233 years of freedom giving motivation to others around the world to do the same with countries like yours and other wonderful democracies. Thank you Bernhard and may you never have to live in a country engaged in armed conflict or governed by a totalitarian regime.
4 years ago