Loading
Israel, Jerusalem, and 14 May 2018

Pray for the peace of Jerusalem [Psalm 122:6]

Many have voiced their opinions about the recent 14 May 2018 violence along the Gaza border with Israel and the formal opening of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem. Consequently I write this article to express my opinion too especially since based on the well recited quote, “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good [people] to do nothing.

Although I am a strong supporter for the creation of a viable, contiguous and independent Palestinian nation, I find it frustrating peace talks have not been held since 2014. However, for real peace to be established to end the violence all of us abhor, it is imperative that Israel’s right to exist and unique status as a “Jewish” state be recognized and the Palestinian “right of return” be limited to solely within the borders of a newly created Palestinian state. Refusal to limit the “right of return” is a de facto attempt to destroy Israel. Furthermore, I find it hard to believe Palestinian authorities in both the West Bank and Gaza have not even attempted to invest in infrastructure improvements to utilize the latest technology and gain economic self-sufficiency in a similar fashion as their Israeli neighbors who have figuratively and literally made the desert bloom within their country. The only rational explanation – Palestinians remain obsessed with Nakba, so stuck in the past and some consumed with such hate they cannot envision a prosperous future nor one that includes a vibrant Jewish Israel.

In addition, based on historical precedent (archaeological evidence of a Jewish presence in Jerusalem date back more than 3,000 years to the 9th century BCE versus the first Islamic presence around 630 CE), scriptural support – The Lord builds up Jerusalem; [H]e gathers the exiles of Israel. [Psalm 147:2], (one of 600+ times Jerusalem is mentioned in the Bible versus 0 times in the Qur’an) and as a strong advocate of religious freedom and tolerance, I believe recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital was the right decision. Of course parts of Arab-populated East Jerusalem or its nearby suburbs could form the basis of Palestine’s “Jerusalem” if both sides mutually agree to such a compromise in the interest of peace.

Despite promises to protect religious freedom when East Jerusalem fell under Jordanian rule after the 1949 Arab-Israeli war, Christians were prohibited from owning property and building churches, Jews were prohibited from worshipping in their temples, Jewish cemeteries were razed, and Islam was proclaimed the official religion within its boundaries.[1] Likewise, when Palestinians were given control over Nablus in 2015, Joseph’s Tomb, sacred to Jews and Christians alike, was promptly destroyed. Jerusalem especially the “Old City” under Israel’s control is the only way to guarantee the protection of religious shrines sacred to all three Abrahamic faiths and ensure religious freedom.

While it is tragic dozens of people lost their lives during the 14 May 2018 riots, Hamas to the greatest extent by encouraging violence and an “invasion” to mark, in their own words, “the beginning of the destruction of Israel” as well as Fatah to a lesser extent share the blame. Had Palestinians merely protested peacefully without throwing fire bombs and engaging in gun battles as some Hamas and Islamic Jihad militants did nor attempt to cut through the border fence and overrun Israeli territory, it is unlikely the IDF would have used tear gas and live ammunition. Each country is obliged to protect and defend their sovereign borders. With that said, Hamas claimed 50 out of the 62 killed were its members;[2] another three belonged to Islamic Jihad meaning 85% of those that died were actually militants instead of unarmed civilians.

It has become too easy and even popular for many to dehumanize Israelis, especially members of the IDF who like each of us have a face, a real family as well as dreams and aspirations for lasting peace and a bright future likely because of the anti-Israeli press coverage, educational ignorance (41% of millennials are unaware 6 million Jews were murdered in the Holocaust, 22% never even heard of the Holocaust, and 66% do not know what Auschwitz is[3]) and anti-Semitism. Perhaps this is the reason why the world shamefully shows a lack of outrage and the media remains largely apathetic with a "Never Remember!" attitude when innocent Israelis are murdered. When Shira Tzur, Yael Yekutiel, Shir Hajaj, and Erez Orbach, four young IDF soldiers were killed in cold blood by an ISIS-inspired Palestinian on 8 January 2017, there was barely a mutter of outrage.

Yes their lives and all Jewish lives are precious too and matter! Without recognition of this basic fact, extremists will continue to be emboldened to carry out their low-grade Holocaust with grave moral, religious and political consequences. The cycle of violence will continue and a Mideast solution will remain as elusive as ever.

To conclude, even if unpopular with many, I express my gratitude to the IDF for keeping Jerusalem and Israel safe from suicidal extremists. Thank you for keeping the many who reside there safe as well as the many tourists including my daughter who visited as part of a church group in 2017.

Note: Jerusalem illustration created from a photo taken by my daughter; bottom photo taken with a member of the IDF in Jerusalem
____

[1] Richard Pollock. What Life Was Like For Christians And Jews When Arabs Ruled Jerusalem. The Daily Caller. 12 December 2017. dailycaller.com/2017/12/12/what-life-was-like-for-christians-and-jews-when-arabs-ruled-jerusalem

[2] Ian Lee and Salma Abdelaziz. Hamas claims 50 of its members died in Monday's clashes in Gaza. 16 May 2018. CNN. www.cnn.com/2018/05/16/middleeast/hamas-members-gaza-deaths/index.html

[3] Julie Zauzmer. Holocaust study: Two-thirds of millennials don’t know what Asuchwitz is. Washington Post. 12 April 2018. www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2018/04/12/two-thirds-of-millennials-dont-know-what-auschwitz-is-according-to-study-of-fading-holocaust-knowledge/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.15d8dc365dd4

18 comments

Stormlizard said:

Yes William, too often Ignorance of History dominates.
5 years ago

William Sutherland said:

Thank you Stormlizard for your courageous comment since often times, especially when it's convenient and popular to remain silent, it takes courage to speak!
5 years ago

╰☆☆June☆☆╮ said:

Very well written William.
I agree with you...all lives matter. There have been so many lost opportunities in this 100 year war, to create a lasting and peaceful solution.
I really wonder if it will EVER end.
We can only pray....
5 years ago

William Sutherland said:

Thank you Chris and June for your insightful replies!
5 years ago

Pam J said:

For whatever reason... I do not think pouring petrol on a fire is helpful.

There are far too many wrongs on BOTH sides and throwing the match after the petrol is not acceptable.

This will solve nothing any more than was solved before.

Its the old chant of "God is on our side" from BOTH sides.

Just maybe if both sides threw their hypocrisy and righteousness out the window and started with a little humility and an occasional brain cell used.... something might just work.

You asked for an opinion William..and mine doesnt seem to be a majority one.. but that is ok too.

Frank discussion will be the only way to get anywhere...
5 years ago

William Sutherland replied to Pam J:

I agree, "throwing a match after the petrol is not acceptable" but not in the context you're thinking of. The provocative Nakba marches and false promise of "return" to all Israeli territory have to stop. It's despicable Palestinian emotions are stoked by unrealistic promises since for Israel to agree to this would amount to national suicide. So yes frank discussion, humility and a dose of reality (precisely why the Jerusalem move is constructive even though at this time many don't view it this way since in reality the optimal and only realistic approach for Pals is to seek "ownership" or some kind of joint sovereignty over the Al Aksa Mosque similar to the "ownership" nation's exercise over their embassies and property in foreign lands rather than unrealistic control over and possession of the Old City) are the only way peace can be achieved.

Also why is it okay for Palestinians to say their eventual nation will be an "Islamic" state but they cannot and refuse to accept Israel being a "Jewish" state? Kind of hypocritical here!

Thank you for your comment Pam.
5 years ago

Amelia said:

A well expressed and thought provoking article, William.

Quote: " Of course parts of Arab-populated East Jerusalem or its nearby suburbs could form the basis of Palestine’s “Jerusalem” if both sides mutually agree to such a compromise in the interest of peace." Is this ever going to be possible?

The problem with wars of religion and territory is mostly to do with entrenched fundamentalist beliefs. Hatred and violence is the result, as we have experienced in the UK with the religious divisions in Ireland.

Are we all to blame I wonder? European colonial powers partitioned the Ottoman Empire into a series of separate states along lines of their own choosing, with no real understanding of the possible outcome.

We must all contrive to bring peace into a world that seems to be intent on prolonging war at any price, resulting in needless death and the destruction of communities. That can only be done with reasoned debate, and above all tolerance.
5 years ago

William Sutherland said:

Sadly you're right Amelia. Violence and hate beget violence and hate especially when religion is involved. It takes real courage to break from the cycle as Northern Ireland did although with Brexit, I can only hold my breath and pray sectarian violence doesn't re-emerge wasting more innocent lives.

And yes, as we tragically know, colonialism has been very destructive and it's adverse impact continues to this day since no thought was given to ethnic and cultural diversity such as in Africa. Sudan and Eritrea are just two of the festering examples as ethnic strife continue. :(

Sometimes I wonder if we really are such an advanced species since world peace and tolerance re: religion, freedom of thought, freedom of expression and individuality (the right to be who you are) seem so hopelessly elusive. Thank you for your comment Amelia.
5 years ago

Elbertinum said:

Die israelische Politik ist menschenverachtend -
Sie hält sich nicht an UNO Resolutionen -
aus der Geschichte lernen erfordert manchmal viel Mut -
5 years ago ( translate )

Don Sutherland said:

Good piece and important points.

The latest violence fomented by Hamas reflects the Palestinian intransigence that has remained the sole barrier to a mutually-agreed peace that would allow for the creation of a sovereign Palestinian state. That unyielding attitude goes back to 1947 prior to Israel's re-establishment as a sovereign state.

The UN Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) recommended a partition plan to accommodate the basic needs of both the region's Arab and Jewish peoples. Immediately following the UN General Assembly’s November 29, 1947 vote to adopt UNSCOP’s recommendation, Dr. Abba Hillel Silver, chairman of the American section of the Jewish Agency stated, “We extend a hand of genuine friendship to the new Arab state which is to be established in Palestine.” He called on the Arab countries “to join with us in an era of peaceful and fruitful collaboration.” The Arab leadership rejected the outcome. “Today’s resolution destroys the [UN] Charter and all previous covenants,” Saudi Arabia’s Emir Feisal al-Saud said, describing the Arab League’s position. Other Arab representatives warned of imminent war.

On May 14, 1948, the Jewish leadership declared Israel’s rebirth as a sovereign state. In response, Arab armies launched an invasion. The newly re-established Jewish state prevailed in that war. Over the next quarter century, Israel would fend off repeated efforts to conquer it. Israel would also have to deal with waves of terrorist attacks carried out against its civilians. Those attacks continue to this day.

Despite those wars and acts of terrorism, the Palestinians have had historic opportunities to still gain a state. In 2001, Yasser Arafat rejected a generous peace plan that would have given the Palestinians approximately 97% of the West Bank (inclusive of land swaps), all of the Gaza Strip, much of East Jerusalem, and a $30 billion-$40 billion refugee fund in exchange for accepting Israel’s existence and restricting Palestinian return to the new Palestinian state. In his autobiography, My Life, former President Bill Clinton explained:

I knew the plan was tough for both parties, but it was time—past time—to put up or shut up. The Palestinians would give up the absolute right of return; they had always known they would have to, but they never wanted to admit it. The Israelis would give up East Jerusalem and parts of the Old City, but their religious and cultural sites would be preserved; if had been evident for some time that for peace to come, they would have to do that… And they would get a formal end to the conflict. It was a hard deal, but if they wanted peace, I thought it was fair to both sides…

When Arafat came to see me, he asked a lot of questions about my proposal… When he left, I still had no idea what Arafat was going to do. His body language said no, but the deal was so good I couldn’t believe anyone would be foolish enough to let it go…

Arafat’s rejection of my proposal after Barak accepted it was an error of historic proportions.


In 2008, Prime Minister Olmert made a proposal that was almost identical to the Clinton parameters. Palestinian President Mahoud Abbas rejected it, because it did not create a “right of return” to Israel for Palestinian refugees and their descendants.

Israel has more than done its part for peace. The Palestinians have not. Choices have consequences and the tragic lack of courage and foresight among Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas to seize opportunities for peace has inflicted enormous economic, social, and humanitarian costs on the Palestinian people while compelling Israel to defend itself against varying levels of aggression and violence directed at it.
5 years ago

William Sutherland replied to Don Sutherland:

This evidently was a more far-reaching proposal than Arafat let on. Considering we live in the post 9/11 world filled with extremism and intolerance in the name of Islam (e.g. ISIS, al-Qaeda, Taliban) even though both antithetical to Islam and the Prophet Muhammad and thus heresies, I'm not sure future offers will or should include any parts of the Old City to protect religious freedom and tolerance.
5 years ago

Elbertinum said:

Danke für deinen ausführlichen Bericht -
Fehlentscheidungen hat es auf beiden Seiten gegeben -
Wahrscheinlich muss erst eine neue Generation heranwachsen -
Es gibt kleine Zeichen von Hoffnung wo Israelis und Palästinenser zusammenarbeiten -
Das große Problem sind immer Hardliner -
5 years ago ( translate )

William Sutherland replied to Elbertinum:

Hope there are more joint projects since they are the best way for people to be humanized to each other.
5 years ago

William Sutherland said:

Thank you Elbertinum, Don,and Biobauer for contributing to this conversation.
5 years ago

Elbertinum replied to :

Das hängt vom guten Willen aller ab - ich habe die Hoffnung - alles wird gut enden -
Der Islam war jahrhundertelang sehr tolerant -
5 years ago ( translate )